ποΈ Do SBF's Parents Get to Keep the Money?
Joe and Barbara have settled with the FTX estate. Also: Abundance is Just Effective Altruism; Bitboy arrest; Mario Nawfal; EOS; D.C. influence; 11x; and more.
Welcome to your weekly Dark Markets news roundup. It is an *absolute doozy,* so letβs just get right into it.
How Much Did They Get to Keep?
The FTX Estate has settled its clawback suit against Joe Bankman and Barbara Fried. My immediate fear was that they were simply getting to keep the $10 million that their son embezzled and gifted to them. The estate initially filed its clawback suit just a few days before Samβs criminal trial - timing that may be significant. The suit contained staggering allegations and details about Joe and Barbaraβs enthusiastic spending of FTX money and direct involvement in the crime.
I spoke very briefly to a lawyer about this, and the reality seems less clear. The suit appears to have been resolved through a private settlement, which likely involved returning whatever money Joe and Barbara had not already spent. The catch there is that the money was reportedly used to fund SBFβs legal defense, which was certainly not cheap. It now seems likely theyβll never have to repay that stolen money.
ICYMI: Sam Bankman-Fried, Crypto Trading, and the Trap of Magic Circles
Of course, there is much speculation about the exact reason or mechanics behind the settlement. The pseudonymous Twitter acount FTX Historian has speculated that the suits against both the parents and Daniel Friedberg were primarily intimidation tactics to silence their criticism of the bankruptcy team at Sullivan & Cromwell, and specifically to keep them from testifying at the criminal trial. I wouldnβt be terribly shocked by that, or more broadly by the idea that this was a matter of gamesmanship well beyond an attempt to recoup funds.
At the same time, though, Judge Kaplan prohibited βblaming the lawyersβ as a legal tactic for Samβs defense, and itβs very plausible that fighting the Bankman/Fried parents, who have access to effectively infinite, free, top-tier legal help, would simply have been more trouble than it was worth.
3-Question Reader Survey
Weβve seen explosive growth here at Dark Markets in recent months, and with the SBF book project drawing towards a close, there will be much more attention to building this channel.
If youβre able to, please take just two minutes to complete a three-question demographic survey that will help me find more readers like you, and continue building this community. Thank you.
Support My Tornado Cash Trial Coverage for The Rage
Starting in mid-April, Iβll be covering the criminal trial of Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm for The Rage, an emerging cypherpunk-first news outlet. I had a blast covering the month-long SBF trial for Protos, and Iβll be reuniting with my CoinDesk colleague Sage for this one.
But Stormβs trial is in many ways more serious and high-stakes: it stands to set precedents for the legal risk of software developers by pushing the definition of βconspiracyβ to simply mean βwhen someone uses your product.β
If youβre able to support our work, please consider a donation to The Rage below.
BitBoy Arrested!!!
Crypto has some great characters, most of them simultaneously grim and silly turbo-freaks like Craig βFaketoshiβ Wright, Brock βIsland Boyβ Pierce, Roger βNotaxβ Ver, and of course SBF. But Ben βBitboyβ Armstrong is the crypto grifter for the rest of us: a hustler with no ideology, no grand deception, and seemingly no inscrutable evil lurking in his soul: just a lunchpail willingness to take payments to conduct pump-and-dumps on what used to be a huge social media and YouTube following.
For more than a year since being kicked out of his own company, Armstrong has been on the kind of crashout we can all imagine for ourselves if we lost everything (except for probably several million dollars, an insane sports car, and seemingly, a drug habit). He announced in October of 2023 that he had divorced his wife and taken up with a fellow crypto influencer (nightmare fuel).
Heβs also been harassing former business partners and consuming copious amounts of drugs β¦ and now heβs been arrested, with intake documents listing him only as a βfugitive from justice.β There are rumors this was in connection with harassing a judge, but thatβs inconclusive. More as this develops.
βAbundanceβ is Just Repackaged Effective Altruism for Right-Wing Democrats
Youβve almost certainly seen discussion of The Abundance Agenda, a new book/theme/meme intended to revitalize the Democratic Party (ahem), put forth by Vox cofounder Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson. It seems like typical neoliberal think-tank pablum, and more politically-oriented critics than myself have already spent time unpacking it (hereβs Malcolm Harris for The Baffler).
But I was struck by the prominence the book gives to cultured meat. It was a jolting reminder that both Klein and Thompson identify as Effective Altruists. Cultured meat is just one of the (pro-capital, pro-tech) βsolutionsβ that EAs love, and I anticipate finding a lot of other EA ideas snuck into this supposed Democratic agenda.
11x AI Sales Automation is a (Literal) Fraud
TechCrunch reports that a startup backed by Andreessen-Horowitz (A16z), focused on using AI to write cold sales emails, has been dramatically inflating its user numbers. This is because, well, its product doesnβt work. Early customers that fed into early sales numbers exercised βbreak clausesβ in contracts after disappointing results (the churn rate was 70-80%), but 11x would continue counting their full-term contracts as recurring revenue. Now 11x has also been caught making false claims that Zoominfo and Airtable are clients.
Good Reads: PoorGuard on Innovation
A quick logroll for a friend: crypto lawyer PoorGuard has a new, in-depth piece on Innovation and the Operational Environment. It is very much tailored for big bossy-bosses who run large organizations and face challenges like technical obsolescence and business-model disruption. Itβs very grown-up! Recommended.
Mario Nawfal, Rug Merchant
Mario Nawfal has put in serious work as a vaguely credible influencer entangled with crypto - he (used to?) host Spaces with machinic regularity, even I got roped into one once as he searched for fresh blood. But there was always something super sketchy abou the guy, and a new report from Protos provides a great rundown of his allegedly extensive involvement in rugpulls, as well as allegations of media manipulation, a pay-for-play βincubator,β and other malfeasance.
EOS Pivots to Banking or Something
EOS is easily the funniest project in crypto, if by funny you mean shamelessly cynical shovelware. In 2017-2018, the Dan Larimer-associated chain conducted the largest βinitial coin offeringβ (ICO) ever, raising more than $4 billion dollars. Or at least, it looked like that, though there were allegations even at the time that Block.One, the company linked to EOS, had βloopedβ funds to make it look like there were more donations than actually came in.
Anyway, the really important part came after, when Block.One basically took all the EOS money and then did almost nothing to develop EOS (except heavily market pay-to-play nodes to disadvantaged communities in Detroit and elsewhere). The ICO money went into a variety of similarly inept side-projects - including a now-failed voice chat app and Bullish, the exchange the nobody uses but which now owns Coinbase. EOS had the firepower and name recognition to thrive, but instead it languished, dropping from a top-10 project into the basement of forgotten, dead chains.
Read More: CoinDesk is Dead. Hereβs Who to Blame.
Eventually, Block.One explicitly abandoned the EOS project, removing all ambiguity from what one industry insider described as βa deceitful ICO, whether that was planned from the beginning or not,β and another bluntly called βan absolute fraud.β Now EOS, guided by a lingering community, is rebranding to βVaultaβ and focusing on βweb3 banking.β That doesnβt mean actual banking banking, but on-chain custody through various vendors who will probably benefit from this more than anyone else.
How Crypto Bought Washington (A Little Too Hard)
Iβve been trying to be more vocal about the specific, unconventional perspective from which I write this newsletter: That crypto is real, and not inherently a scam β¦ but is also definitely very useful for the same kind of tech-investment fraud that practically defines our era.
And just as Elon Musk has leveraged false promises of autonomous driving into recklessly unchecked power, Current Affairs details how the crypto industry has leveraged its massive, (and meaningfully scam-derived) profits into political clout. I support the industryβs right to represent itself, but I think itβs clear that the ironically short-termist strategy of courting Donald Trump was not merely ethically bankrupt but tactically insane. Weβre seeing outright authoritarianism in America, and crypto will now be tied for all time to this - the exact opposite of what it stands for.
β
three-question demographic survey that will help me find more readers like you
β
DZM: Ah, my results show my readers are overwhelming 80 to 90 year old women who have over $1 million in yearly income. I will definitely need to write more articles about how to avoid fraudulent storefronts for financial trust services related to leaving your money to your pets.
β
β
I had a blast covering the month-long SBF trial for Protos
β
Protos is basically the only crypto news I read any more. Cointelegraph went complete shill well over a year ago. Then I noticed Rekt News started to get purple prosey, apparently the original writer(s) are long gone. If it was just in the style of Raymond Chandler, that would be fine. But itβs more like an AI was given a normal article of reporting and then told to adopt the persona of Raymond Chandler to Chandlerize it.
CoinDesk then let go of a lot of people (as mentioned later in this substack), and I think it died pretty much at the same time. This example https://davidzmorris.substack.com/p/breaking-coindesk-is-dead-heres-who is less deathknell and more the Weekends at Bernie's antics of a corpse. Letting go of so much of the staff is weird. As you'd think the new owner, a fan of authoritarian doctrine, would want a fully staffed organization so as to properly report news and not just fluff pieces glorifying the current authoritarian administration, largely put in place by that same fan of authoritarianism. I mean you'd think it, if thatβs how you think, because he and his cronies have been successful in making everyoneβs critical thinking levels just right for complacent exploitation. Everything counts in Thiel amounts.
But Protos I still check out occasionally. It suffers from the same problem as Rekt News had even before the purple prose. No by-lines. Heck, CoinDesk started going one better and started naming the editors too. I think those are important. If they want to protect their authors, a nice compromise would be each editor and author had a pseudonym, as long as the same pseudonym was used throughout. No crypto news is at the point of permaweb, version control, and dedicated accounts (psuedonymized or not) for content creators and facilitators. Instead the most blockchaining we get is tokenization for an Instagram clone trying to jump on the pump train.
β
β
it stands to set precedents for the legal risk of software developers
β
Unfortunately, it seems like it might be a bit of a Sacco and Vanzetti thing. Historians are definitely in agreement that the trial was unjust against Sacco and Vanzetti, but most historians also agree they were likely active members of a violent extremist group. I think most readers of the Tornado case realize the difference between: A) Stopping a person who is clearly a group leader of a group doing bad activities by using actually viable alternative charges that are easier to convict uponβlike tax evasion against Al Capone (or perhaps any number of credible charges against a certain current president). And B) Punishing a person ambiguously related to a group that is ambiguously related to ambiguously bad activities on ambiguous charges that seem to run afowl ofβand may ultimately hurtβthe very laws and legal processes that protect the less powerful like you and me.
β
β
been on the kind of crashout
β
Two in a row. Floodgates open. Polymarket has greatest odds on βrizzβ being next. UMA token holders will hotly contest DZMβs future use of βlooks like the crypto rapper's legal defense was lacking in Rizzlekahn.β
β
β
cultured meat
β
Don't know that term, I'm imagining someone pickling bologna, and I'm frankly terrified.
Oh! Lab grown meat. Well, whether that is bad, depends on what you are trying to solve. Anything can be used as a vehicle for grift regardless of it being potentially amazing technology (see: crypto). As I've said before, I believe that a spectrum to consciousness is likely. Cells grown in a petri dish, ideally with no central nervous system, but at least with no brain, seems a lot less problematic than the current way of ingesting those cells. But if you disregard that, and say itβs best from a practical or cost-effective point of viewβeh, itβs more like any climate-reversing strategy that is not just planting more trees. But people are even more addicted to exploiting land than they are exploiting non-human animals, so that is worth considering.