👁️ Ryan Salame Kept Spending FTX Money
Also: Coinbase Got Pwned; 764 ring arrests; Klarna backs off AI; Cardano shenanigans; more sus SBF d*ckriding
Welcome to your weekly Dark Markets news roundup. I am two weeks away from submitting a full and edited manuscript to my publisher! The past nine months have been truly blissful, but being done is also going to be a wild one.
Thanks to all of you for your continued support, and please spread the word about this newsletter if you enjoy it! It will continue to be a huge part of getting the word out about the book. Every referral helps!

More SBF Fluffing: It’s like a damn mental illness. Nearly a full year after the New York Times gushed about Sam’s investment prowess and Yale professors mortgaged their reputations to claim “FTX was never Bankrupt,” Harry Stebbings posted this excerpt of some midwit VC marvelling at Bankman-Fried’s “amazing” early investments in Anthropic and Cursor (if you know who that is, let me know).
There’s a lot to say here about the absolute lust that people have to suck off a guy who used to have a lot of money, and who was only able to make any investments at all because he stole billions of dollars. But more to the point, Ramnik Arora ran most of FTX’s investments, and for that matter, Anthropic’s current valuation is itself a fucking fraud based on the myth of AGI propogated, above all, by Eliezer Yudkowsky.
Did Cardano Steal from Investors? Masato Alexander, an NFT artist, claims that Charles Hoskinson used a “genesis key” to manipulate the Cardano blockchain and reassign ownership of $225 million worth of investor tokens to a development fund. These are controversial claims, subject to interpretation, and this is not an endorsement of them. But it highlights two things that should be scandals in their own right: first, that Cardano is not decentralized or trustless; and second, Cardano’s heavy marketing of early ADA sales to Japanese retirees and nursing home patients.
764 Pedophile Ring Bust: Credit where it’s due, the Trump DOJ has seemingly taken down dozens of members of an actual pedophile ring, known as 764. A dedicated investigator going by @bx (who also has a Substack:
) has a thread rounding up the array of really vile figures who have been locked up. The network appears to have grown largely on Discord and similar platforms.Coinbase: Kill Your Customer
Coinbase joined the S&P 500 on Monday, but the timing is not good: they just announced that a huge amount of customer data was stolen by bribing international customer service workers.
There are two points to be made here:
A) Coinbase fucked up in a totally avoidable and hilariously stupid way, and
B) “Know Your Customer” laws need to be seriously rethought.
Coinbase fucked up by making way too much information available to underpaid offshore customer service reps, including customers’:
Full legal name
Home address
Government‑ID images (e.g., driver’s license, passport)
Account balance and linked bank account information
Personally, I like Coinbase’s service and use it for small amounts of crypto. I don’t appear to have been personally exposed, and it might not have been a big deal if I was - I’m not worth robbing.
But some people keep a LOT of money on Coinbase, and for them, this is a major, major security threat. International criminals have their crypto balances and home addresses. There’s a lot of fear about kidnapping and extortion resulting from this breach - and since it seemingly happened in January, some have speculated that it’s already triggering kidnap attempts, like this one in France.
Now - to Know Your Customer laws. I’m ambivalent about money laundering controls in general, because they genuinely seem to mostly create hassles for normal people while doing less than nothing to stop actual crime: just look at the handling of Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) to FinCEN, which are mostly used as cover-your-ass by banks and rarely actually investigated.
But even if you agree with the AML agenda, current KYC practices are simply stupid. They turn *every* financial service you interact with into a giant hoard of very sensitive data. And there are imminently practical solutions available today: most notably the possibility of using Zero Knowledge Proofs and other forms of cryptography to minimize data sharing.
Ryan Salame Kept Spending FTX Money
The invaluable FTX Historian has highlighted recent filings in the clawback lawsuit targetting former FTX executive and campaign-finance fraud cutout Ryan Salame. The filing, from April 21, claims that Salame and his baby mama Michele Bond went on a $6 million shopping spree before the FTX estate could get their hands on the money. $370,000 of this spending allegedly took place in four days last December before an asset freeze could be imposed. The pair also attempted to hide their $4 million house from creditors by transferring the deed, and Bond has submitted a request for “living expenses” from the estate including “requests to pay for a nanny, housekeeper, handyman, nurse, hair care, lawn service, and pool maintenance.”
Bond and Salame, remember, are a match made in grifter heaven: Bond used $400,000 of stolen FTX money to fund a vanity political campaign. Currently, her prosecution is continuing, with a status conference before George B. Daniels at SDNY scheduled for July 15th.
It all speeks to one of my more strongly-held beliefs: Fraudsters are usually really fucking stupid, hapless people. Those kids are not going to be alright.
Klarna Wants its Humans Back
About two years ago, the buy-now-pay-later fintech Klarna (which should be burned to the ground for entirely unrelated reasons) announced it had stopped hiring humans, and would replace both its customer service and marketing teams with AI. Several big model upgrades later, that’s not working out at all. The company
Klarna’s CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski told Bloomberg that "cost unfortunately seems to have been a too predominant evaluation factor when organizing this, what you end up having is lower quality."
In other words, this is all total bullshit.
“If Anyone Builds it, Everyone Dies.”
For better or worse (it’s probably for worse) Eliezer Yudkowsky is Publishing a Book. This appears to be the first time he’s done that with a real publisher (Little-Brown), which is notable given his stature, but I certainly can’t throw stones. I also can’t really blame him for making his first big one a book about the idea that has defined his life: that artificial intellligence will literally murder humanity.
I *can*, however, blame him for seemingly failing to evolve beyond that idea in the most obvious way possible: to pay at least some attention to the implications of LLMs to the human informational ecosystem, which seems far more likely to actually harm society in the very near term than, I quote:
“The nanomachinery builds diamondoid bacteria, that replicate with solar power and atmospheric CHON, maybe aggregate into some miniature rockets or jets so they can ride the jetstream to spread across the Earth's atmosphere, get into human bloodstreams and hide, strike on a timer.”
Look, this guy’s a nut - so overindexed on one idea that to prove it, he’s basically writing science fiction. Anyway, his nutty book comes out in September, which is frankly great news for me - mine is coming in October, so it will be a nice rebuttal/counterpoint.
To paraphrase As Good As It Gets:
"How do you write Corporations-Are-People(TM) so well?"
"I think of a real human and I take away empathy and accountability."
Coinbase is TradFi. This is just typical TradFi / FinTech / Big Tech BS. /If there are no real consequences for companies losing your data, then they will./ If there is no regulation, no penalty more expensive/prohibitive after calculating in risk of a publicly-known breach than the cost of protecting and securing your data then it will not happen. Zero knowledge proofs are awesome, but really those employees did not need that access. It would have cost slightly more to put in proper safeguards, to make it so they only got access as they truly needed, to have proper oversight. But who knows how many vectors they needed to cover? And their stock isn't hurting too much by this, is it? (Where could consumers otherwise go that would protect them?) And /no one else/ needs to do it (regulations) so why eat the cost that gives your competitor (who doesn't eat it) an edge? Sure, you could, if you are Coinbase size, try a Meta/Facebook gambit to lobby for more regulations to give you a moat that prevents others from being able to catch up. But if you are Coinbase size, you can also just try the Amazon/Google thing and get into tons of verticals that also gives you moat. Of course those verticals are completely antithetical to the Sherman Antitrust Act. If you have more regulations, then that could be a chink in your armor to get your monopoly busted (as is now being attempted with Google). In many ways, SBF tried the Meta gambit hoping to regulate against his competitors. Well, that sure worked out well for him.
TradFi /needs/ regulation. KYC and AML without consumer protections is typical corporations not being accountable and trying to pass the buck (well, the farming instrument that represents doing work, corporations will otherwise be keeping all the bucks for themselves).