Discussion about this post

User's avatar
awbvious's avatar

https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/nayib-bukele-is-not-the-bitcoin-hero-we-need

I don't remember seeing this the first time around, and it is very good. It reminds me that there is more than public and private, it's not a simple dichotomy. One can both strongly advocate public like the ledger of Bitcoin and private like the personal data on an investigative journalist's phone.

And as usual it comes down to power. I've tempered from saying every monetary transaction should be put online and be transparent, at least without thinking of how that might happen. Eventually sure, if that's even possible, but let's make it a goal that, when possible, the most powerful will have to be transparent first and work our way down to the least powerful. Because there is no magic switch to instantly transform all past, present, and future transactions into on-chain and transparent, and a heavy handed implementation is very likely going to mean the most powerful will exploit the least powerful.

If you think of investigative journalists, they are almost by definition less powerful than whom they are investigating, and thus their communications and personal interactions (and probably even financial transactions) should be more private than the world leaders they are trying to hold accountable.

"

The case for America building a Bitcoin reserve is … well, there really isn’t a case, because we print the world’s payment rails: USD. That status will be threatened by any boost to Bitcoin - a boost which the endorsement of a reserve would provide.

"

Well, again, all about implementation, and certainly this is not the administration to trust to do it, but that's like saying if one has power one should never cede it. There is a great case in ceding power in the fact a nation built on a constitution that cedes power from a single individual did pretty great things. Of course too many Americans decided to make America very un-great and here we are.

"

Founder Charles Hoskinson is also a turbo-creep, which is important because he still substantially controls the whole thing. On the other hand, he’s a big Trump fan, so who’s to say what’s right and wrong here.

"

Heh, this is pretty funny. "Your honor, yes, my client is almost certainly guilty of the charge. On one hand, there was assault. On the other hand, there was battery. So who's to say what's right and wrong here?"

"

his shenanigans crash the economy and the price of Bitcoin with it.

"

Yes and no, because the price of Bitcoin in USD is based on the price of USD. So for that reason you'd think it will go "up" (relatively). But people need at least /some/ money to put it in anything safer than what it is currently (assuming you're not already deeply in predatory credit card debt). Unless you can actually use it buy stuff instantly and easily. Which we can't. Still. Thus, it's more just investment and thus, yes, likely to also go "down."

I mean, it's a non-issue for the ultra rich. But actually being able to use it instantly, a lot of places, and effortlessly means a lot for everyone else. And yet we can't. Why it almost seems like it hasn't happened because the ultra rich don't need it. Funny that.

Expand full comment

No posts